Disclosing that a game uses generative AI is good practice no matter where you stand on the subject. It’s the correct way to inform customers about what we will be playing and how it was made.
I actually believe we should properly credit and even list the software involved on the Steam store page for full transparency and because it’s interesting. But that’s a topic for another time.
The issue I want to raise is that there are some games on Steam that do not disclose the usage of generative AI and I think it’s not right to not inform people.
I’m also encouraging anyone reading to not buy a game that uses generative AI, being disclosed or not.
ReStory: a game about fixing stuff
This game is about fixing electronics. It’s very chill and seems to be the kind of game I could get into really easily for hours on end. There is demand for games like it because fixing old electronics is soothing and satisfying.
It would be great to play if only it was aligned with my personal values and I hate generative AI meaning that ethically I can’t play it.
On the Steam page they do not disclose using generative AI at all while it is used in the playtest and in the trailer.
Two threads were opened on the subject on the Steam Community page:
- Generative AI not disclosed (by myself, archived)
- Can you please add an AI content disclosure
- Steam Store page (archived version)
Both threads were locked with the developer choosing a response that is not coherent with what was asked of them.
I believe that marking a response as an answer when it responds to a question I never asked is not something that the devs or the moderators should be allowed to do. This is just disingenuous.
Generative AI was used
Being hyped by a game that seems interested and getting slowly disappointed while watching the trailer and noticing that characters and the background are looking weird is not a feeling I vibe with. So I digged a bit deeper just in case.
I decided it would be great to look at the background image and another image used as sort of a title card.
Let’s first take a look at this screenshot from the trailer taken at 1:18.

In this screenshot we only need to look at elements that should be repeating a pattern or work the same way. The character is hold money bills and from experience we know that the details on the bills should be consistent with each other (provided they are the same currency).
Another repeating pattern can be found on the top of the screenshot when looking at how the lanterns are tied.
Then we have this background that is used in the trailer at 1:25 and as the main background in the game.

Generative AI can’t really do text will and it shows really will in this screenshot where some scribbling is used in some place, some other place uses some weird font that cannot be achieved with a text tool built into an image editor.
On the right of the image the word ラーメン is missing the dash on top of the フ.
This is a big mistake as it would change the word from “ramen” to “fumen”, which doesn’t designate the same thing at all, especially when it shows a picture of a bowl of noodles which are ramen.
I am not criticizing the art direction/style
It’s easy to point out “mistakes” as some form of art direction because you don’t like that way it’s drawn or it the art style doesn’t feel right. Sadly there’s some heavy artifacting, the kind of artifacting that is not easy to produce manually.
It is much easier to use a text tool to write some characters and be done with a clean look rather than attempt to blur and smear it while deforming the characters.
It is important for the users to be able to make an informed choice as some people are not able to visually detect generative AI being used and do not support its usage.
Steam also provided some guidelines about generative AI and how it must be disclosed back in January 2024.
I love art, I love artists, I love gaming
I understand that no artist wants their art getting brought up whenever or not generative AI was used. But I also understand that some people have lied about their art being legitimate (video about the subject) and there’s the possibility that the artist they are working with didn’t disclose that fact and is hiding it.
It even happens when the “artists” flexes about not using generative AI as seen on Twitter… Once again.
Having play tested ReStory for a couple of minutes I think the 3D model of the phone I’ve taken apart was looking good and legit.
So why would other element be made by generative AI instead of having a real person use their drawing skills for that ? Wouldn’t it be better ?
I believe it would be better.
I enjoy art. I go to museums, I read manga, look at art books. I have bought picture books. I have made my own picture books with photos I have taken. Images can be very powerful when it comes to telling a story or setting a scene.
I will continue to defend the artists that make me dream.
I will also bring down the hammer and speak against anyone using generative AI for the concept, pre production, alpha/beta, whatever-not-final-step, early access… Because at no point it is ethically right. Don’t wanna pay the artist? Then just don’t and be a thief openly because there’s no legal repercussions when you make big bucks and are caught torrenting copyrighted materials.
I’m disappointed
As a developer myself I take proud in creating software. I’m really disappointed when game developers turn to slop to make a game that I would have properly enjoyed quite a bit. Should I ignore the slop and just play it? Hell no!
Like I said I want to encourage people to not buy the game, to not play the game and if you wish to play it you need to call out the devs. We must stand for what is right because we are on the verge of having our hobby change for the worse forever.
I will not be giving this game my time and they will not get my money. I already gave it too much attention with this post and my tweets and it pisses me off that a game I would have loved is built on lying by omission and not being fully transparent.























